<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The most &#8216;influential&#8217; websites mentioned in blogs. Really?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalprescriptions.co.uk/2009/11/the-most-influential-websites-mentioned-in-blogs-really/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalprescriptions.co.uk/2009/11/the-most-influential-websites-mentioned-in-blogs-really/</link>
	<description>a dosage of social media / digital culture / marketing communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Delaney</title>
		<link>http://digitalprescriptions.co.uk/2009/11/the-most-influential-websites-mentioned-in-blogs-really/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalprescriptions.co.uk/?p=409#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Hi Jordan - one of the few things that all these sites have in common is that (a) they are not attributable to an individual and (b) they comprise lots of different stuff, some of which is important and some of which is not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So agreed - these is not an interesting or useful list - for both reasons. (No slight on your post though!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jordan &#8211; one of the few things that all these sites have in common is that (a) they are not attributable to an individual and (b) they comprise lots of different stuff, some of which is important and some of which is not.</p>
<p>So agreed &#8211; these is not an interesting or useful list &#8211; for both reasons. (No slight on your post though!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Delaney</title>
		<link>http://digitalprescriptions.co.uk/2009/11/the-most-influential-websites-mentioned-in-blogs-really/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalprescriptions.co.uk/?p=409#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Hi Jordan - one of the few things that all these sites have in common is that (a) they are not attributable to an individual and (b) they comprise lots of different stuff, some of which is important and some of which is not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So agreed - these is not an interesting or useful list - for both reasons. (No slight on your post though!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jordan &#8211; one of the few things that all these sites have in common is that (a) they are not attributable to an individual and (b) they comprise lots of different stuff, some of which is important and some of which is not.</p>
<p>So agreed &#8211; these is not an interesting or useful list &#8211; for both reasons. (No slight on your post though!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by jordanstone</title>
		<link>http://digitalprescriptions.co.uk/2009/11/the-most-influential-websites-mentioned-in-blogs-really/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by jordanstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalprescriptions.co.uk/?p=409#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by jordanstone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by jordanstone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

